Ecosystem Atlas — strategic industries as decision tools

01The atlases

One method, several sectors

Every atlas is built the same way — researched from official sources, adversarially verified, and wired into one graph — so a new sector is a research campaign, not a rebuild.

Live

Aerospace

6,600+ organizations across 120+ countries — launch, satellites, components, space data, capital, incentives, and live program windows. Regional and Capital Editions.

Live · for clients

Nuclear

3,800+ organizations across 100+ countries: power plants, fission and fusion developers, the fuel cycle, suppliers, research reactors, regulators and the defense nuclear enterprise, mapped from open, official sources.

In development

Biodefense & biomanufacturing

Defense and public-health agencies, manufacturing institutes, CDMOs, synthetic-biology companies, and the investors and talent pipelines around them.

Live · free

National security pathways

For students: internships, fellowships, scholarships and programs across the national security community, with eligibility, pay and deadlines checked against official pages.

FOR STUDENTS →

02The layers

One graph, eight working layers

L1Entities & segments

Industry, capital, government, research, infrastructure, programs — classified into each sector's working segments: launch to space data in aerospace, fission to fusion in nuclear.

L2The connection graph

Supply relationships, ownership, investment, membership, and program participation — the dependencies that decide outcomes.

L3Incentive racks

Live instruments with stated rates, caps, and eligibility across the US and allied markets — a comparables shelf for recruitment offers and site negotiations.

L4The timing radar

Solicitations, on-ramps, cohorts, and budget events with dates taken only from official pages — so outreach lands when decisions are being made.

L5The diligence board

Companies scored on technology readiness, operating heritage, US foothold, and demand fit — a ranked answer to "who should we call Monday?"

L6Policy positions

The offices that shape national industrial strategy — agency heads, ministers, council chairs — tracked as positions, with current holders verified.

L7The failure ledger

Companies that collapsed, what support they had and lacked, and what the collapse cost — the evidence base for why ecosystem support exists.

L8Workforce depth

Government employment and wage data by state and occupation, aligned to the map — the labor answer behind every siting question.

The Ecosystem Atlas map view: region bands for International and United States, entity tiles for agencies and programs, filter bars for segment, bridge and risk, workforce and capital — The workbench: every organization tiled by region and type, with filter lanes for segments, bridge & risk, workforce, institutions, demand, and capital.

ICEYE record in the atlas: fourteen risk and readiness tags, a 53-out-of-100 Workable bridge score with factor bars for home regime, ownership, traction, US foothold and SBIR path, a hard-penalty flag, and generated ask-on-the-call diligence questions — A company record, scored: ICEYE at 53/100 "Workable" — factor bars for home regime, ownership, traction, US foothold and SBIR path, a hard-penalty flag for key-person risk, and the generated "ask on the call" questions an analyst would otherwise spend a day writing.

Texas SEARF grant fund record in the atlas showing the State Incentive Program tag, awards to date including Firefly and Intuitive Machines, and evidence-stamped connections — An incentive instrument: Texas' SEARF fund — the verified $150M appropriation, and evidence-stamped award connections with amounts, facilities and job counts — the comparables shelf, one record deep.

03Method

Why you can act on it

Every record enters the atlas through the same discipline: the page behind it was fetched and read, an independent verification pass tried to refute it, and what survived carries its source and date. Program windows are never inferred. Removals are logged, not hidden.

Fetched-source doctrine — a claim without a retrieved page behind it doesn't ship. Directory listings and press mentions don't qualify as evidence.
Adversarial verification — second-pass reviewers re-fetch every source and default to refuting the researcher; fields are downgraded rather than left optimistic.
Honest absence — when a market has no live incentive instrument, the atlas says exactly that. Knowing a gap is real intelligence.

04Access

Two editions, one map

Each sector atlas ships in two editions — available today for aerospace. Both are delivered as a signed-in web application, refreshed from the research base. Engagements add custom depth: your region's comparables, your target list diligenced, your windows watched.

Subscriber access

Regional Development Edition

The working map for development organizations: every entity, connection, incentive instrument, and timing window, with maturity, US-presence, and readiness scoring. The analytical layers are held back.

Request access

Qualified clients

Capital Edition — the full atlas

Everything the practice holds: bridge scoring with factor breakdowns, ownership and entanglement analysis, export posture, the intel views, and the generated diligence questions — the complete decision instrument, read-only under your own login.

Request full access

Economic development organizations — recruitment targeting, incentive comparables, and the argument for resources, with evidence.
Companies entering the US market — landing precedents, state-by-state comparisons, and demand timing.
Investors — a scored sourcing screen with the failure comparables that show where support gaps kill companies.